90 x 180 mm twelve slot aluminium profile at about 9.50 kg/m for a CNC router gantry beam, with rail seats machined in one setup and M10 slots for the carriage and uprights.
| Material | Aluminium |
|---|---|
| Alloy Grade | 6063-T5 |
| Temper | T5 |
| Section Size | 90 x 180 mm, twelve slots |
| Slot | 12 x 10 mm groove, M10 hardware |
| Length | Cut to the gantry length, rail seats machined to the drawing |
| Tolerance | Cut length +/-0.5 mm, rail seat flatness and co-planarity to the drawing, section to EN 755-9 |
| Surface | Mill finish / clear anodised / black anodised, with rail seats masked where the height matters |
| MOQ | One beam; matched pairs quoted together |
| Lead Time | 2 to 3 weeks for mill finish, plus 1 to 2 weeks for rail seat machining, plus about a week for anodising |
| Loading Port | Shanghai / Ningbo |
| Supply Ability | Long-bed machining for rail seats, with matched pair production for two-beam gantries |
| Payment Terms | T/T 30% deposit + 70% before shipment | L/C at sight |
| Trade Terms | FOB | CIF | EXW |
| Certifications | Dimensional report including rail seat flatness and co-planarity, material certificate to EN 10204 3.1 on request |

Torsion, in almost every router that fails. A 90 x 180 mm twelve slot aluminium profile is very stiff in bending about its strong axis and much less stiff in torsion, because the slots open up the section and an open section twists easily. On a gantry, an off-centre cutting load applies a torque along the whole span, and the resulting twist at the tool shows up as a cut that is deeper on one side.
That is why a single-beam gantry is limited by how far off centre the spindle can go, not by how much the beam sags at mid span. If the machine has to cut across the full width, the answer is usually two beams separated in the Y direction, connected by a plate at each end — the pair resists torsion as a closed box, and each beam only carries its share of the bending.
Numbers on this page are estimates from the mass and the envelope, with the assumptions written out. They are here so the arithmetic can be repeated with real section data, not to replace the section data sheet.
The section weighs about 9.50 kg/m, which back-calculates to a cross-section of roughly 3519 mm2. With an envelope of 90 x 180 mm and a perimeter of 540 mm, that gives an average wall of about 6.5 mm. Treating the section as a rectangular tube with that average wall, the second moment of area is about 1390 cm4 about the strong axis and about 460 cm4 about the weak axis — estimates that ignore the slot grooves, so the real values will be lower.
| Span | Deflection, strong axis | Deflection, weak axis |
|---|---|---|
| 1500 mm | about 0.036 mm | about 0.108 mm |
| 2000 mm | about 0.086 mm | about 0.258 mm |
| 2500 mm | about 0.168 mm | about 0.503 mm |
| 3000 mm | about 0.290 mm | about 0.870 mm |
Two conclusions follow. First, the beam has to be oriented with its 180 mm depth in the bending direction — mounted the other way round it is three times softer and the numbers in the right-hand column apply. Second, deflection grows with the cube of the span, so a 3 m gantry is not 50 percent worse than a 2 m gantry, it is more than three times worse.
Because a linear rail is far straighter than an extrusion. The extrusion standard allows a straightness and a twist that are entirely acceptable for a frame and completely unacceptable for a rail seat. Bolt a rail onto an as-extruded face and one of two things happens: the rail follows the profile and the carriage binds, or the rail stays straight and the bolts preload it into a curve, which shortens its life.
There are three ways and they are ranked by how much of the accuracy survives shipping.
| Approach | How it works | Achievable co-planarity | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Machine both seats in one setup | Both faces cut in the same pass on one beam | The best available, set by the machine | Needs a long machine and a big setup |
| Two beams, machined as a pair | Both beams clamped together and cut together | Good, and it survives assembly if the pair is not separated | The pair must be shipped and handled as a matched set |
| Shim and indicate on assembly | Rails aligned with a dial gauge and shim stock | Workable, and it depends entirely on the fitter | Skilled labour, and it does not survive a re-assembly |
| No machining, bolt to the extrusion | Not an alignment method | Whatever the extrusion happened to be | Binds, and it is the most common mistake |
The practical instruction: decide at drawing stage whether the rails are on one beam or two. One beam means one setup and the best result. Two beams means they must be machined as a pair, marked as a pair, and shipped as a pair — and if they are ever separated in the workshop, the alignment has to be re-done.
It matters on a moving gantry and it does not matter much on a fixed one. That single distinction decides whether this section is a good idea.
On a moving gantry there is a further trap: the acceleration force is applied to the beam as a bending load, because the beam has to accelerate its own middle. A 19 kg beam accelerating at 2 m/s2 is a distributed load of about 38 N/m along its length, on top of gravity and the cutting force. That is usually small compared with the cutting load, but it is at a different frequency, which is why a light gantry can sound fine and still chatter.
Sequence matters more than torque here, because every step after the rail is fixed can only make the alignment worse.

Around 2.5 to 3 m of span for a single beam, and around 4 m for a properly braced pair. Beyond that the section gets so deep that the mass and the cost stop making sense, and the machine wants a welded steel fabrication or a cast iron bridge instead.
Browse 45 Series Aluminium Profiles, Strut Profiles, or see the 90 x 180 mm twelve slot section for the full section data, and the 45 x 180 mm ten slot section when the beam has to be shallower in one direction.
About 1.5 to 2.5 m for a single beam at a deflection budget around 0.1 mm, and up to about 4 m for a properly braced pair. Beyond that a welded steel fabrication is usually the better answer.
Torsion. An off-centre cutting load twists the beam along its length, and an open slotted section twists easily. Two beams separated in Y resist it as a closed box.
Yes. An extruded face has straightness and twist that are acceptable for a frame and unacceptable for a linear rail seat. Machining both seats in one setup is the only way to get co-planarity without shimming.
With the 180 mm depth in the bending direction. Mounted the other way round the section is roughly three times softer, and the deflection numbers triple.
About 9.50 kg/m, so a 2 m beam is about 19 kg before the Z axis. On a moving gantry that mass limits acceleration; on a fixed gantry it only affects floor loading.
Yes, one pass along the full length, and both seats in the same setup where they are on one beam. Send the rail positions and the co-planarity requirement with the drawing.
The co-planarity requirement is the number that decides the price. Say what it is, and say where it is measured, because a rail seat measured at the ends reads differently from one measured at the middle.
Span, rail type, rail positions and the co-planarity you need are enough. Tell us whether the gantry moves or the table moves — it decides whether mass or stiffness is the governing problem.
Request a quotation