Also searched as how to choose aluminium extrusion profile, aluminium profile selection guide, choosing aluminium profile size, t-slot profile selection, aluminium extrusion specification, 40x40 profile selection.

Nine questions, three decisions

The standard selection guide asks nine things: required size, slot size, alloy, application match, length, surface finish, accessory compatibility, supplier, and a final checklist. It is a complete list. What it is not is a sequence, because the nine items are not the same kind of thing. Three of them are inputs you have to measure or decide. Four are outputs that follow from those inputs. Two are commitments you make once and then live with.

Sort them that way and the guide turns into a procedure.

The practical value of this sort is that it tells you what to do first. Measure the span. Write down the load and where it acts. Decide the deflection limit. Then let the section fall out of the arithmetic, and only then make the three commitments. Most over-specified frames in the field are not the result of a bad calculation; they are the result of a slot standard and a cut list being fixed before the span was ever measured.

Input one and two: the span, and where the load sits

The span is the distance between supports, not the length of the profile. That distinction alone accounts for a large share of frames that deflect more than expected: a 3,000 mm rail with three intermediate supports has a 750 mm span, and it is eight times stiffer in deflection terms than the same rail supported only at its ends, because deflection goes with the cube of span.

The second input is the position of the load, and it is the one that is almost never written down. The same force produces a very different deflection depending on where it acts, and the coefficient that describes it is a small number you can carry in your head.

Read the first and last rows together and the design lesson is obvious. Moving the same load from the middle of a supported span to the end of an overhang multiplies the deflection by sixteen. Nothing about the profile changed. This is why a cantilevered operator panel or a cantilevered light arm needs a section two sizes bigger than the rail it hangs from, and why “it is only a light arm” is a sentence that precedes most sagging frames.

Input three: the deflection budget

The third input is the only one that is a business decision rather than a measurement: how much movement is acceptable. There is no universal answer, but there are three conventions that cover most industrial work, and choosing between them is worth more money than any material substitution.

A worked example, and the answer that costs nothing

A drive unit weighing 80 kg is mounted at the middle of a 1,800 mm rail. The customer has asked for L/500 because a sensor is mounted on the same member.

1. Convert the load. 80 kg × 9.81 = 785 N. The coefficient k is 1.0 for a central point load.
2. Set the allowance. 1,800 / 500 = 3.6 mm.
3. Solve for I. I = 1.0 × 785 × 1,800³ / (70,000 × 48 × 3.6) = 785 × 5.832 × 10⁹ / 1.2096 × 10⁷ = 378,500 mm⁴, or about 38 cm⁴.
4. Read the catalogue. A 45 × 45 heavy gives about 19.5 cm⁴ and fails by a factor of two. A 60 × 60 heavy gives about 38 cm⁴ and just passes, at 6.4 kg/m.
5. Try the cheap alternative. Put a support at the middle, so the unsupported span becomes 900 mm. Deflection scales with L³, so the required inertia falls by a factor of eight, to about 4.7 cm⁴. A 40 × 40 standard at 9.2 cm⁴ covers it with margin.

Which is why the useful first question in profile selection is not “40 or 45”. It is “where can I put a support”. Section changes move the answer by tens of per cent. Support positions move it by multiples.

The three commitments, in the order they become expensive

Once the arithmetic is done, three decisions remain that cannot be undone cheaply. They are worth thinking about as a group, because the order in which they are usually taken is the opposite of the order in which they should be taken.

Everything else can be corrected as the project develops. The wall thickness can be upgraded on the next order. The accessory brand can change freely within the same slot standard. The section can be revised for the second machine. It is only these three that carry a real penalty, and only the slot standard is genuinely permanent — which is why the slot deserves the most thought and usually gets the least.

The slot standard is not the same thing as the envelope

Buyers routinely assume that the series number and the slot are the same decision. They are not, and the mismatch produces one of the most irritating failures in modular framing: a nut that fits a slot it was not designed for, in a joint that will not close.

Alloy and temper: what the upgrade actually buys

Alloy choice is presented in most guides as a strength decision, and it is — but strength is rarely the limit in a profile frame. The distinction matters because the two properties respond very differently to the change.

Read the first and third rows together. Moving from 6063-T5 to 6061-T6 more than doubles the stress at which the material yields, and changes the stiffness by about one per cent in the wrong direction. A frame whose limit is deflection — which is nearly every frame — gains nothing at all from the upgrade, and pays for it in extrusion difficulty, tool wear and price.

Where the upgrade does pay is where the failure mode is strength rather than movement: a heavily loaded joint, a member in tension, a tapped end taking a bolt load, a bracket that has to resist a peak shock rather than a working load. And there is a documentation point that catches exporters out. The same designation does not mean the same number on both sides of the Atlantic: under EN 755-2 a 6063-T5 section at 3 to 25 mm wall is specified at 160 / 110 MPa, while ASTM B221-02 puts the same designation at 152 / 110 MPa up to 12.7 mm and 145 / 103 MPa from 12.7 to 25.4 mm. That is roughly 15 per cent on tensile and 18 per cent on yield, for a material with the same name. A drawing that says “6063-T5” and nothing else has a real tolerance on it that nobody has written down.

Finish, length, and the two things that arrive late

Surface finish and cut length are usually decided at the end of the process, after the section has been chosen. Both are better decided at the beginning, for the same reason: both are cheaper to get right at the extrusion stage than at any point afterwards.

Finish. Mill finish is the cheapest and the only one that is naturally conductive at the joints. Anodising gives 10 to 25 µm of aluminium oxide and a clean appearance, and it is a dielectric, so it breaks electrical continuity between members. Powder coating gives 60 to 100 µm and a wider colour range, and it is worse on both counts. The sequence matters as much as the choice: anodise a profile and then cut it, and every cut face is bare metal — which is good for bonding and a corrosion question at the same time. Mask the slot faces before anodising and the frame can be both attractive and continuous. That masking is a low-cost request at extrusion and a workshop job later.

Length. Profiles are extruded in mill lengths, commonly 6 m, and the practical problems are all downstream of that number: how the lengths are shipped, how they are handled on site, and how accurately they are cut. A mill cut is typically good to about ±1 mm with a burr; a machined cut is good to about ±0.2 mm with a clean face. That difference is invisible on a 200 mm bracket and decisive on a 2,000 mm frame member, because an end that is out of square by 0.2 mm puts the far end of a 2,000 mm member 10 mm out of position. If you cannot cut square in your own workshop, buy the cut-to-length service — it is cheaper than discovering the problem at assembly.

The order template, in nine lines

What a supplier needs in order to quote the right thing, in the order the decisions should be taken.

• The structural inputs: unsupported span, load in kg and its position, and the deflection limit expressed either as a ratio (L/300, L/500) or as a figure in millimetres.
• The section: envelope with a reference to a drawing or a supplier code, and the wall thickness with a tolerance. “4040” alone is a category, not a section.
• The slot standard: the mouth dimension in millimetres, measured, not the series name.
• Alloy and temper: 6063-T5 for almost everything; 6061-T6 where a joint or a member is strength-limited rather than deflection-limited.
• Tolerance class: which standard governs, and the class within it. EN 755-9 indexes the tolerance to the circumscribing circle, not the side length.
• Cut length and end condition: every length, with the end condition — mill cut, machined square, tapped, or drilled to a drawing.
• Machining: hole positions, thread sizes and depths, and the datum they are measured from.
• Finish: which faces, which finish, and which faces must stay bare.
• Evidence and packing: mill certificate, dimensional report, and how the lengths have to be packed for your site.

Nine lines is more than most enquiries carry. It is also the difference between a quotation you can compare with another quotation and a price you have to take on trust.

Frequently asked questions